Despite too much secrecy by Charleston leaders ahead of a November field trip to London, Amsterdam and Copenhagen, the jaunt to unpack development lessons that can benefit the next chapter of Union Pier on the Cooper River seems to have been worth it.
And while we still don’t know how much taxpayers spent on costs to send city employees, including Mayor William Cogswell, they and nonprofit leaders were able to see up close European examples of what is working and not working in new lives for large urban spaces.
With terms like “urban infill,” resilience, climate adaptation, “compact urbanism” and sustainability being tossed around like shots of whiskey, the ability to absorb what works and doesn’t in urban redesign should help guide the owner, Beemok, and the city as it transforms Union Pier from a port to a living space for thousands.
“We witnessed examples that show it is possible to create places that age well, becoming even better with the passage and patina of time,” architect Christian Sottile, whose firm wrote the report, told us after the trip. “The most successful architectural and urban infill blends seamlessly with the old.”
It’s that sentiment that was missing with the first iteration of Union Pier’s future when the S.C. Ports Authority and a developer seemed hellbent on erecting more than 20 chunky buildings like those now along Gadsdenboro Park and Washington Street. Preservationists and area residents rightly screamed about how continuing that kind of nonsense would change Charleston into more of a historic Disneyland instead of a close-knit community.
As Historic Charleston Foundation’s Winslow Hastie wrote in a recent newsletter to supporters, all developers aren’t great developers, with many looking only to the bottom line and a quick return — not to create a place where people will want to visit and will age with grace.
“There is a legitimate reason that the residents of Charleston are wary of any large new project,” he wrote. “There is little faith that development will improve our quality of life. The bad examples … are rampant across the peninsula.”
But as his HSF colleague Lisa Jones reinforced in a recent comment, “the key determinant for these high-quality developments is the ability for the owner to take the long view.” And that lesson, she said, was confirmed on the European trip “and gives us hope for the Union Pier project.”
For the Preservation Society of Charleston’s Brian Turner, the Richmond Riverside area of London, which is close to where the comedy Ted Lasso is filmed, offered design lessons that integrated a historic look seamlessly with modern traditional buildings. “What struck me is how the buildings were simple, nearly indistinguishable from the old and built to last. They require minimal maintenance because they were so well thought through at the outset,” he said.
If Union Pier’s future can incorporate a blend of English-looking historic buildings plus Dutch sustainability and Danish resilience through strategies like climate parks, we’re off to a good start.
Help keep the City Paper free.
No paywalls.
No subscription cost.
Free delivery at 800 locations.
Help support independent journalism by donating today.