STATEHOUSE REPORT |  ISSUE 25.13  |  MARCH 27, 2026
  • BIG STORY: Hate crimes bill still in limbo as session nears end
  • ROUNDUP: S.C. taxpayers get filing extension as Statehouse debates additional tax cuts 
  • ISSUE TRACKER: S.C. House advances immigration enforcement bill 
  • LOWCOUNTRY, Ariail: Highway to nowhere
BIG STORY

Hate crimes bill still in limbo as session nears end 

By Jack O’Toole, Statehouse bureau | Greek mythology tells the story of Sisyphus, forced to spend eternity pushing a boulder up a hill, only to see it roll back down to the bottom — where he has to start again.

For the past 11 years, since the death of his friend and colleague Sen. Clementa Pinckney in the 2015 Mother Emanuel church massacre, Charleston Democratic Rep. Wendell Gilliard has been pushing a hate crimes bill up the S.C. Statehouse hill. 

South Carolina Statehouse | file photo Credit: Sean Rayford file photo

Twice, in 2021 and 2023, he shouldered it to the top in the S.C. House, passing the bill with big bipartisan majorities — only to see it roll back down to the bottom in the S.C. Senate, where it died without a vote.

Still, Gilliard says he hasn’t given up hope. In fact, he told Statehouse Report this week that he likes his chances of getting the bill through the House again this year — even with the legislation currently stuck in committee and the clock ticking down to a May adjournment.

“Really, I’m optimistic,” Gilliard said. “If there’s one thing I’ve learned in my years of service on Charleston City Council and here in the House, it’s that you have to stay optimistic about anything in South Carolina as it pertains to government.”

Though in this case, he quickly added, his optimism isn’t just about the power of positive thinking.

“Believe it or not, we just left the speaker’s office,” he said, referring to Republican House Speaker Murrell Smith of Sumter. “And we were talking about this bill for almost 40 minutes, going back and forth on how to get it out of the House and approved by the few senators who’ve been holding it up.”

He added, “Hate crimes happen every day. They happen to our Black brothers and sisters, our Jewish brothers and sisters, our White brothers and sisters. And until this bill passes, we’re just turning a deaf ear to these victims because we don’t have a law.”

What’s a hate crimes law — and why doesn’t S.C. have one?

If there’s one thing that supporters and opponents of hate crimes laws generally agree on, it’s this: In America, the First Amendment protects speech — even the speech that offends us most.

That’s why hate crimes laws, including Gilliard’s Clementa Pinckney Act, don’t actually create any new categories of crimes. Instead, they add what are called “sentencing enhancements” to existing offenses such as murder and assault. 

Put simply, hate crimes laws impose additional prison time on people who are convicted of committing crimes motivated by hate. And all but two states in the country — South Carolina and Wyoming — have one.

“Hate crimes laws simply say that if you hurt someone because you hate the way they look or believe or love, that can be considered during sentencing,” said Sue Berkowitz, an attorney with the S.C. Appleseed Legal Justice Center. “Why would we not want to do that if it could deter even one person?”

That’s the logic that’s led more than 20 counties and cities across the state to pass hate crimes ordinances at the local level since 2018. But as statewide law proponents note, local ordinances can carry penalties of no more than a $1,000 fine and 30 days in jail — making the laws toothless in the face of violent felony offenses that already carry prison time.

Longtime Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott is a local leader who’s supported hate crimes laws at both the state and local level. And to explain why, he pointed Statehouse Report to the March 19 conviction of a Columbia man in federal court for the hate crime of shooting at his neighbor simply because he was Black. 

“This victim was terrorized based entirely on his race,” Lott said, noting that the federal courts are often too backlogged to handle every incident. “A crime against a victim based solely on race, religion or national origin should be prosecuted and held accountable by the state.”

The debate ahead

Regardless of whether hate crimes laws successfully clear the First Amendment hurdle with sentencing enhancements, some GOP members of the House and Senate have argued that they violate the spirit of the Constitution. 

Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey of Edgefield discussed that concern with reporters last year, as he allowed a parliamentary maneuver to keep the bill off the floor.

“I’m not a fan of enhancements,” Massey said. “I think we ought to treat everybody the same, and if somebody assaults you, it ought to be the same as a penalty for assaulting me.”

S.C. Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. Jordan Pace, R-Berkeley, echoed that idea in a Thursday interview.

“There are a lot of us that are of the mindset that we treat everyone equally — you know, the 14th Amendment,” Pace said, invoking the post-Civil War amendment guaranteeing equal protection under the law. “And that to do otherwise would be a violation of that constitutional principle.”

What’s more, he said, from his perspective, the bill’s inclusion of “gender” in addition to “sex” is just an attempt to insert what he called “left-wing ideology” into a S.C. criminal law.

And unlike Gilliard, he thinks the bill is more likely to die in committee than reach the House floor again this session.

“There are just more pressing matters that the voters want us to tackle — gas prices, insurance rates, just a load of affordability problems,” he said. “And I think those affordability issues will take precedence over bumper-sticker ideological priorities like that bill.”

Richland Democratic Sen. Darrell Jackson, who’s been sponsoring hate crimes legislation in the Senate even longer than Gilliard has in the House, disagrees strongly with Pace on the merits but largely shares his forecast.

“I’m not ruling anything out, but with the current mindset and the current calendar, I’m not optimistic,” he said. “We need to be thinking about what we’re going to do to change things if it doesn’t pass this session.”

And that process, he said, should start with sitting down over the summer with business and faith leaders, who mostly support the legislation, but haven’t lobbied with sufficient force to get and keep it moving.

To illustrate what he meant, he pointed to the NIL bill that passed through the two chambers in a matter of days last month thanks to hard and effective lobbying by state universities and their supporters.

“USC and Clemson and others were saying, ‘This is going to put us at a competitive disadvantage if you don’t act,’ and the bill passed quickly,” Jackson said. “Now, we need business leaders to say the same thing about being one of only two states in the country without a hate crimes law. It’s putting us at a competitive disadvantage in terms of economic development.”

As for the concerns some have raised about enhancements, Jackson noted that a bill enhancing penalties for interfering with first responders was allowed to reach the Senate floor this week, where it passed.

“Just give us an opportunity to vote on the hate crimes bill,” he said. “Listen, if the Senate votes it down, then that’s something we’d have to live with. But to not have a chance to vote it up or down is really disturbing.”

And despite his pessimism about the bill’s chances this session, he closed by stressing that continued inaction is a choice.

“This could be done, and done quickly,” Jackson said. “We could pull the bill out of committee right now, put it on the floor for a vote and have it on the governor’s desk before the session ends on May 14.”

He added, “We could put the issue to rest this year.”

ROUNDUP

S.C. taxpayers get filing extension as Statehouse debates additional tax cuts

By Jack O’Toole, Statehouse bureau  |  With major tax cuts applicable to this year’s returns still under debate in the S.C. House and Senate, the S.C. Department of Revenue has extended the filing deadline for state income taxes until October 15.

Unsplash

Important to note: The extension only applies to those filing for a refund — not those who owe money.

“This extension applies only to the deadline to file your return, not to pay what you owe,” the department said in a statement. “You will owe penalties if you do not pay at least 90% of your 2025 tax liability by April 15, 2026.”

At issue in the legislature is a bill passed by the House earlier this month that would give state income taxpayers the same breaks included in President Donald Trump federal tax cuts bill last year. The S.C. Senate Finance Committee approved the bill Tuesday, but it hasn’t yet reached the floor for a vote.

If passed, the bill would cost the state treasury about $300 million this year, a number that would have to be reconciled during the budget process between now and May 14.

In other recent news

2026: Third Democrat files for governor’s race. William “Billy” Webster has worked in both Republican and Democratic presidential administrations and has donated to candidates in both parties. Now, he’s entering the race himself.

Statehouse: S.C. Senate advances bill requiring students to use bathrooms based on sex at birth. A bill that would require South Carolina public school students to use restrooms based on the sex listed on their birth certificate cleared the state Senate on Wednesday, sending the measure back to the House for further consideration.

S.C. measles outbreak remains below 1000 as no new cases reported. After no new cases were reported by the Department of Public Health in the update March 24, the state’s total stands at 997.

Why some S.C. charter schools remain open despite low ratings. Advocates argue that the schools fill a critical gap — they give struggling students a second chance. Public school district officials contend that all schools, regardless of the students they serve, should meet the state’s definition of progress and achievement.

The Citadel announces a new president. The Board of Visitors announced this week that it has selected Gen. Frank McKenzie, USMC (Ret.), ’79, as the 21st president of The Citadel.

ISSUE TRACKER

S.C. House advances immigration enforcement bill

By Jack O’Toole, Statehouse bureau | A bill that would require dozens of state law enforcement agencies to assist in federal immigration enforcement efforts received committee approval this week and will now head to the S.C. House floor.

The bill, which mandates that all law enforcement agencies with detention facilities attempt to enter into so-called 287(g) agreements with federal officials, passed the 14-8 along party lines. About 35 local law enforcement agencies and the S.C. Law Enforcement Division already voluntarily participate in the 287(g) program.

Bills that are on the move

Taxes: A bill to cut the state’s top tax rate from 6% to 5.21% is on the governor’s desk awaiting his signature. Further property and income tax cuts totaling more than half a billion dollars are advancing in both chambers. LATEST: The Senate Finance Committee voted favorably on a House bill to extend last year’s federal tax cuts to S.C. income taxpayers. 

Concurrency: A bill by Beaufort Republican Sen. Tom Davis that would allow local governments to limit development in areas with insufficient infrastructure was amended and advanced on March 12 by the Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee.

Juvenile justice: Two bills have passed the House — one making it easier to try 16 and 17 year olds as adults and another to mandate fingerprinting when juveniles come into the system. LATEST: A bipartisan bill to add additional guardrails before some juveniles are moved to adult court is pending before the House Judiciary Committee.

Bills in less of a hurry

Judicial selection: A bill with the support of leaders in both chambers would give the governor more power in selecting state judges. LATEST: S.C. House members passed the bill 86-25 on Feb. 11, sending it to the Senate, where it currently resides in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

DOGE S.C.: Multiple bills promising to cut the state workforce and the regulations they enforce have been introduced for consideration in 2026. In particular, House GOP leaders have pledged to get their “Small Business Regulatory Freedom Act” passed through the S.C. Senate this session. LATEST: The bill is still awaiting action in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Rolling back affirmative action and DEI: Several bills are still currently awaiting consideration, including one to codify Gov. Henry McMaster’s executive order ending affirmative action in state contracting.

Abortion: A House Judiciary subcommittee on Jan. 14 killed one bill to treat abortion as homicide and advanced another to reclassify abortion pills as Schedule IV drugs. LATEST: The S.C. House on Feb. 4 voted 81-31 to advance the abortion pill rescheduling bill to the S.C. Senate.

ROBERT ARIAIL’S LOWCOUNTRY

Highway to nowhere

Credit: Robert Ariail

Award-winning cartoonist Robert Ariail has a special knack for poking a little fun in just the right way.  This week, he has a little something to say about a highway in South Carolina being named for the current president.

Send us your thoughts

Please send us your thoughts about politics and policy in South Carolina, but make sure to leave phone numbers and hometowns to help us verify them for publication.  We publish non-defamatory comments, but unless you provide your contact information – name and hometown, plus a phone number used only by us for verification – we can’t publish your views.  

  • Have a comment?  Send your letters or comments to: feedback@statehousereport.com.  Make sure to provide your contact details (name, hometown and phone number for verification.  Letters are limited to 150 words.
ABOUT STATEHOUSE REPORT

Statehouse Report, founded in 2001 as a weekly legislative forecast that informs readers about what is going to happen in South Carolina politics and policy, is provided by email to you at no charge every Friday.

We can use your help

We’re proud to offer Statehouse Report for free.  For more than a dozen years, we’ve been the go-to place for insightful independent policy and political news and views in the Palmetto State. And we love it as much as you do.  

But now, we can use your help.  If you’ve been thinking of contributing to Statehouse Report over the years, now would be a great time to contribute as we deal with the crisis.  In advance, thank you.

More

  • Mailing address: Send inquiries by mail to: P.O. Box 21942, Charleston, SC 29413
  • Subscriptions are free.  If you want to subscribe, send us an email:  feedback@statehousereport.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject. We hope you’ll keep receiving the great news and information from Statehouse Report, but if you need to unsubscribe, go to the bottom of the weekly email issue and follow the instructions.
  • Read our sister publication:  Charleston City Paper (every Friday in print; Every day online)
  •  © 2026, Statehouse Report, a publication of City Paper Publishing, LLC.  All rights reserved.

Help keep the City Paper free.
No paywalls.
No subscription cost.
Free delivery at 800 locations.

Help support independent journalism by donating today.

[empowerlocal_ad sponsoredarticles]