Itโ€™s hard to imagine a politician more schizophrenic than Mitt Romney. As Massachusetts governor, Romney was pro-choice, supported amnesty for illegal aliens and was gay friendly. As a 2008 Republican presidential candidate, Romney became pro-life, opposed amnesty and gay marriage. In his new book, โ€œNo Apology: The Case for American Greatness,โ€ Romney says hardly anything about abortion, illegal aliens or social issues, but plenty about how government must grow and do more, with his biggest beef with President Obama being where it should grow and what it should do. Critics might be inclined to compare Romneyโ€™s big government philosophy to that of the last Republican president but Romneyโ€™s is actually worseโ€”particularly on the issue that has most defined Bushโ€™s legacy.

Whereas President Bush ran for president in 2000 opposing Bill Clintonโ€™s nation building overseas (something Bush would not live up to), Romney begins his book and presumably his 2012 presidential campaign, by making crystal clear that his concept of โ€œAmerican greatnessโ€ is inextricably tied to more war, more nation building and an even more ambitious foreign policy. Romney not only firmly believes the US should be the worldโ€™s policeman, but continuously frames practical foreign policy questions in moralistic, religious-like language. Claims brother Romney: โ€œthere can be no rational denial of the reality that America is decidedly a good nation. Therefore it is good for America to be strongโ€ฆ freedom for our grandchildren and for people everywhere can be guaranteed only by America-a strong America.โ€ Looking back on the 20th century, Romney explains: โ€œwe found that our vital interests could not be secure in the face of threats to the cause of freedom elsewhereโ€ฆ America took on the task of anticipating, containing and eventually defeating threats to the progress of freedom in the belief that actively protecting others was the best way to protect ourselves.โ€

For Romney, foreign policy is not simply a question of the national interest or even practical defense, but securing freedom for โ€œpeople everywhere,โ€ and โ€œAmerican greatnessโ€ means recognizing that the national interest and global interests are, and always have been, indistinguishable. While Bush said of Americaโ€™s dealings with other nations in 2000, โ€œIf weโ€™re an arrogant nation, theyโ€™ll resent usโ€ฆ If weโ€™re a humble nation but strong, theyโ€™ll welcome us,โ€ Romney explicitly rejects that America has been or ever could be โ€œarrogantโ€ and Bushโ€™s notion of a humble nation directly contradicts exactly what Mitt believes makes America great-benevolent hubris.

Whereas George Washington warned against โ€œforeign entanglementsโ€ and John Quincy Adams advised that America โ€œgoes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy,โ€ Romney wants endless entanglements and sees monsters to destroy everywhere. In addition to championing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Romney considers Iran, China, North Korea and Russia grave โ€œthreatsโ€ and also believes it is the USโ€™s moral obligation to admit Georgia into NATO, which would have conceivably put American boots on the ground in that country in 2008. During that border battle between Georgia and Russia, a campaigning John McCain immediately injected the US into the mix, proclaiming that Americans were โ€œall Georgians now.โ€ No doubt, Romney shared McCainโ€™s sentiment, though what concrete interests the US might have in that conflict are vague or speculative at best. Still, Romney forebodes: โ€œWe are engaged in two hot wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and facing growing threats in almost every region of the world. Weakness invites challenges, acts of intimidation, acts of aggression, and sometimes war.โ€ For Romney, โ€œsometimesโ€ is all the time.

Read the entire column

ADDENDUM: While Romney is out there pushing a hardcore neocon platform for 2012, “Republican Revolution” of 94′ Congressman and MSNBC host Joe Scarborough told an audience at the CATO Institute on Thursday:

“those who are still arguing in 2010 that we can somehow export democracy across the globe or rebuild other countries on the other side of the world in our image, these are the people that we have to call out today, tomorrow and everyday as the dangerous radicals that they are, history has proven them and their worldview to be dangerous and radical.”

No problem Joe! That was exactly my intention with this Romney commentary. Hear Joe’s entire speech here. The whole thing is great.


Help keep the City Paper free.
No paywalls.
No subscription cost.
Free delivery at 800 locations.

Help support independent journalism by donating today.

[empowerlocal_ad sponsoredarticles]