We ran out of room in this week’s paper to run our movie critic’s review of the new Ridley Scott movie, American Gangster. Fortunately, we’ve got this here internet thingamabob. Check out our MaryAnn Johanson’s glowing review here. Then check out the trailer. We’ve got that technology, too — believe it or not! (said with Jack Palance’s trademark mid-’80s hiss).
Related
Help keep the City Paper free. No paywalls. No subscription cost. Free delivery at 800 locations.
Remember how oh-my-god cool it was to hear, all those years back, that Michael Mann, with his movie Heat, was gonna get Al Pacino and Robert De Niro together onscreen for the first time? And then they were hardly together at all except for that one scene, but it turned out to be okay because that one scene was incredible?
American Gangster is like that, except itโs got the combustible combination of Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington onscreen together for the first time. Even if they were actually onscreen together for the first time the same year as Heat (1995) in that bit of sci-fi nonsense, Virtuosity, no one talks about that movie, and no one would have remembered it if I hadnโt brought it up in the first place. So forget I even mentioned it.
So: Ridley Scottโs American Gangster brings together Crowe and Washington, both of whom stalk the screen, as they always do, as if The Movies were invented for them, and how freakinโ explosive can it be to smash these guys into each other? Except they donโt get the opportunity to face off onscreen until more than two hours into the filmโs two-hour-and-forty-minute runtime … and thatโs fine. Why? Because their concurrent stories run parallel and keep you in a state of constant suspense and dread: You forget that the necessities of plot and the conventions of Hollywood narrative require that their two stories eventually collide in Scottโs masterful back-and-forth, which is riveting enough to, ironically, make the crash seem inevitable in a way that is not demanded by clichรฉ but is a function of certain sort of fated irony.
Irony is all over this movie in the most confounding and, ahem, ironically, the most satisfying way, a way that makes you want to shake your head at the paradox of it while also acknowledging its truth. American Gangster is one of those films that, the more you think about it, the more you feel like youโre falling down Aliceโs rabbit hole into a world where the rules work but they piss you off because it seems like if the world were good and decent, they wouldnโt.
The world is not good and decent, perhaps โ might go the theme of Gangster โ but sometimes people are, and sometimes only accidentally.
Croweโs Richie Roberts is a New Jersey cop, a rough-edged working-class guy whoโs trying to better himself by studying law in night school. His colleagues already think heโs โbetterโ than he needs to be: Heโs scorned as a โboy scoutโ for actually following the laws heโs upholding. But heโs also a cocky bastard who hangs out with a childhood friend whoโs now a mafioso; Oh, and heโs kinda mean to his ex-wife and kinda ignores his kid. When he stumbles onto Frank Lucasโs criminal endeavors, he latches onto the case like a bulldog and wonโt let go until he brings Lucas down.
Washingtonโs Frank Lucas was a driver and general dogsbody to the godfather of Harlem, until the godfather died and Frank, looking to better himself, took over the operation. He comes up with a scheme for racheting up his drug business by eliminating the middle man and importing heroin directly from Thai suppliers; his business and marketing acumen is astonishing, and before long heโs selling junk twice as good as anything on the street at half the price. Itโs the American dream of entrepreneurship, of making customers happy โ really happy, in this case โ while raking in the dough. Itโs win-win. Oh, Frank is utterly ruthless and wonโt hesitate to put a bullet in the brain of anyone who steps on his toes, but he believes himself a gentleman, and he is, in his own perverse way. Heโs even good to his mother.
This is all based on a true story that went down in the early 1970s โ Frank and Richie are real; the now elderly Lucas actually worked as a consultant on the film. However, the ring of truth comes not from its factualness, but from Steven Zaillianโs brilliant script, which highlights in what wickedly different directions such qualities as persistence and dedication can take people. Truth comes also from Scottโs production, which is committed to authenticity. Scott shot in real, unfakeable New York City and Thai locations โ no Toronto or Hawaii stand-ins here โ and Zaillian (along with Crowe and Washington) created in the cinematic Richie and Frank two fascinatingly contradictory and complicated men. You canโt entirely hate Frank, for all his terribleness, and you canโt entirely like Richie, for all his virtues. And you canโt forget them.
Related
Help keep the City Paper free. No paywalls. No subscription cost. Free delivery at 800 locations.