Posted inArts+Movies, Unscripted

American Gangster

We ran out of room in this week’s paper to run our movie critic’s review of the new Ridley Scott movie, American Gangster. Fortunately, we’ve got this here internet thingamabob. Check out our MaryAnn Johanson’s glowing review here. Then check out the trailer. We’ve got that technology, too — believe it or not! (said with Jack Palance’s trademark mid-’80s hiss).


Help keep the City Paper free.
No paywalls.
No subscription cost.
Free delivery at 800 locations.

Help support independent journalism by donating today.

[empowerlocal_ad sponsoredarticles]
Posted inArts+Movies, Film Reviews

American Gangster

Remember how oh-my-god cool it was to hear, all those years back, that Michael Mann, with his movie Heat, was gonna get Al Pacino and Robert De Niro together onscreen for the first time? And then they were hardly together at all except for that one scene, but it turned out to be okay because that one scene was incredible?

American Gangster is like that, except itโ€™s got the combustible combination of Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington onscreen together for the first time. Even if they were actually onscreen together for the first time the same year as Heat (1995) in that bit of sci-fi nonsense, Virtuosity, no one talks about that movie, and no one would have remembered it if I hadnโ€™t brought it up in the first place. So forget I even mentioned it.
So: Ridley Scottโ€™s American Gangster brings together Crowe and Washington, both of whom stalk the screen, as they always do, as if The Movies were invented for them, and how freakinโ€™ explosive can it be to smash these guys into each other? Except they donโ€™t get the opportunity to face off onscreen until more than two hours into the filmโ€™s two-hour-and-forty-minute runtime … and thatโ€™s fine. Why? Because their concurrent stories run parallel and keep you in a state of constant suspense and dread: You forget that the necessities of plot and the conventions of Hollywood narrative require that their two stories eventually collide in Scottโ€™s masterful back-and-forth, which is riveting enough to, ironically, make the crash seem inevitable in a way that is not demanded by clichรฉ but is a function of certain sort of fated irony.
Irony is all over this movie in the most confounding and, ahem, ironically, the most satisfying way, a way that makes you want to shake your head at the paradox of it while also acknowledging its truth. American Gangster is one of those films that, the more you think about it, the more you feel like youโ€™re falling down Aliceโ€™s rabbit hole into a world where the rules work but they piss you off because it seems like if the world were good and decent, they wouldnโ€™t.

The world is not good and decent, perhaps โ€” might go the theme of Gangster โ€” but sometimes people are, and sometimes only accidentally.

Croweโ€™s Richie Roberts is a New Jersey cop, a rough-edged working-class guy whoโ€™s trying to better himself by studying law in night school. His colleagues already think heโ€™s โ€œbetterโ€ than he needs to be: Heโ€™s scorned as a โ€œboy scoutโ€ for actually following the laws heโ€™s upholding. But heโ€™s also a cocky bastard who hangs out with a childhood friend whoโ€™s now a mafioso; Oh, and heโ€™s kinda mean to his ex-wife and kinda ignores his kid. When he stumbles onto Frank Lucasโ€™s criminal endeavors, he latches onto the case like a bulldog and wonโ€™t let go until he brings Lucas down.

Washingtonโ€™s Frank Lucas was a driver and general dogsbody to the godfather of Harlem, until the godfather died and Frank, looking to better himself, took over the operation. He comes up with a scheme for racheting up his drug business by eliminating the middle man and importing heroin directly from Thai suppliers; his business and marketing acumen is astonishing, and before long heโ€™s selling junk twice as good as anything on the street at half the price. Itโ€™s the American dream of entrepreneurship, of making customers happy โ€” really happy, in this case โ€” while raking in the dough. Itโ€™s win-win. Oh, Frank is utterly ruthless and wonโ€™t hesitate to put a bullet in the brain of anyone who steps on his toes, but he believes himself a gentleman, and he is, in his own perverse way. Heโ€™s even good to his mother.

This is all based on a true story that went down in the early 1970s โ€” Frank and Richie are real; the now elderly Lucas actually worked as a consultant on the film. However, the ring of truth comes not from its factualness, but from Steven Zaillianโ€™s brilliant script, which highlights in what wickedly different directions such qualities as persistence and dedication can take people. Truth comes also from Scottโ€™s production, which is committed to authenticity. Scott shot in real, unfakeable New York City and Thai locations โ€” no Toronto or Hawaii stand-ins here โ€” and Zaillian (along with Crowe and Washington) created in the cinematic Richie and Frank two fascinatingly contradictory and complicated men. You canโ€™t entirely hate Frank, for all his terribleness, and you canโ€™t entirely like Richie, for all his virtues. And you canโ€™t forget them.


Help keep the City Paper free.
No paywalls.
No subscription cost.
Free delivery at 800 locations.

Help support independent journalism by donating today.

[empowerlocal_ad sponsoredarticles]

Verify your email

We'll send a verification code to .

Gift this article